Perfil de seguridad de nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: evidencia de eventos adversos por interacciones farmacológicas / Safety profile of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: Evidence of adverse events due to drug-drug interactions

Objetivo: evaluar el perfil de seguridad de nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV-r) en la práctica clínica real y analizar la relevancia clínica de las interacciones farmacológicas en el desarrollo de eventos adversos. Material y métodos: estudio observacional, retrospectivo en el que se evaluaron los datos de seguridad de pacientes tratados con NMV-r entre abril y julio de 2022. Se recopilaron datos demográficos y analíticos antes de comenzar el tratamiento. La duración del seguimiento fue de 28 días y se evaluó el número reacciones adversas reportadas, así como si fueron manejadas de forma ambulatoria o precisaron de asistencia sanitaria especializada y la presencia de deterioro de la función renal y hepática. Se revisó el tratamiento concomitante, identificando interacciones farmacológicas teóricas (IFT) cuya gravedad fue definida mediante la clasificación Lexi-interact. Resultados: el estudio incluyó 146 pacientes, 82 (56,16 %) eran mujeres, cuya mediana de edad fue de 65 años (22-95). El número de IFT detectadas y mantenidas durante el tratamiento con NMV-r fue de 164, siendo el porcentaje de pacientes con al menos una interacción de 62,33%. La mediana de IFT por paciente fue de uno (0-5). En 18 pacientes (11,84%) se reportó al menos un evento adverso (EA). Once EA se relacionaron potencialmente con alguna IFT, 7 pacientes requirieron contacto con asistencia hospitalaria para el manejo del EA, 8 pacientes presentaron deterioro de la función renal y 2 de la función hepática a los 28 días. Los principales grupos de fármacos implicados en la aparición de algún EA fueron los anticoagulantes orales, así como los calcio-antagonistas. Conclusiones: nuestros resultados muestran un elevado número de IFT detectadas entre NMV-r y otros fármacos, aunque la frecuencia de EA asociados fue baja. Este estudio proporciona un mayor conocimiento de los fármacos implicados en dichas interacciones y su potencial relación con la aparición de EA.(AU)

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety profile of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV-r) in real clinical practice and to analyze the clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions in the development of adverse events. Methods: Observational, retrospective study in which safety data of patients treated with NMV-r between April and July 2022 in an outpatient setting were evaluated. The duration of follow-up was 28 days and the number of adverse reactions reported, as well as whether they were managed on an outpatient basis or required health care, and the presence of renal and hepatic function impairment were assessed. Concomitant treatment was reviewed, identifying theoretical drug-drug interactions (TDDIs) whose severity was defined using the Lexi-interact classification. Results: The study included 146 patients, 82 (56,16%) were women, whose median age was 65 years (22-95). The number of TDDIs detected and maintained during treatment with NMV-r was 164, with the percentage of patients with at least one interaction being 62,33%. The median number of TDDIs per patient was 1 (0-5). At least 1 adverse event (AE) was reported in 18 patients (11,84%). Eleven AEs were potentially related to any TDDI. Seven patients required contact with hospital assistance for AE management. Eight patients had impaired renal function and 2 had impaired liver function at 28 days. The main groups of drugs implicated in the occurrence of an AE were oral anticoagulants and calcium antagonists. Conclusions: Our results show a high number of TDDIs detected were detected between NMV-r and other drugs. This study provides greater knowledge of the drugs involved in such interactions and their potential relationship with the occurrence of adverse events.(AU)

Safety profile of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: Evidence of adverse events due to DDIs / Perfil de seguridad de nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: evidencia de eventos adversos por interacciones farmacológicas

Objetivo: evaluar el perfil de seguridad de nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV-r) en la práctica clínica real y analizar la relevancia clínica de las interacciones farmacológicas en el desarrollo de eventos adversos. Material y métodos: estudio observacional, retrospectivo en el que se evaluaron los datos de seguridad de pacientes tratados con NMV-r entre abril y julio de 2022. Se recopilaron datos demográficos y analíticos antes de comenzar el tratamiento. La duración del seguimiento fue de 28 días y se evaluó el número reacciones adversas reportadas, así como si fueron manejadas de forma ambulatoria o precisaron de asistencia sanitaria especializada y la presencia de deterioro de la función renal y hepática. Se revisó el tratamiento concomitante, identificando interacciones farmacológicas teóricas (IFT) cuya gravedad fue definida mediante la clasificación Lexi-interact. Resultados: el estudio incluyó 146 pacientes, 82 (56,16 %) eran mujeres, cuya mediana de edad fue de 65 años (22-95). El número de IFT detectadas y mantenidas durante el tratamiento con NMV-r fue de 164, siendo el porcentaje de pacientes con al menos una interacción de 62,33%. La mediana de IFT por paciente fue de uno (0-5). En 18 pacientes (11,84%) se reportó al menos un evento adverso (EA). Once EA se relacionaron potencialmente con alguna IFT, 7 pacientes requirieron contacto con asistencia hospitalaria para el manejo del EA, 8 pacientes presentaron deterioro de la función renal y 2 de la función hepática a los 28 días. Los principales grupos de fármacos implicados en la aparición de algún EA fueron los anticoagulantes orales, así como los calcio-antagonistas. Conclusiones: nuestros resultados muestran un elevado número de IFT detectadas entre NMV-r y otros fármacos, aunque la frecuencia de EA asociados fue baja. Este estudio proporciona un mayor conocimiento de los fármacos implicados en dichas interacciones y su potencial relación con la aparición de EA.(AU)

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety profile of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV-r) in real clinical practice and to analyze the clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions in the development of adverse events. Methods: Observational, retrospective study in which safety data of patients treated with NMV-r between April and July 2022 in an outpatient setting were evaluated. The duration of follow-up was 28 days and the number of adverse reactions reported, as well as whether they were managed on an outpatient basis or required health care, and the presence of renal and hepatic function impairment were assessed. Concomitant treatment was reviewed, identifying theoretical drug-drug interactions (TDDIs) whose severity was defined using the Lexi-interact classification. Results: The study included 146 patients, 82 (56,16%) were women, whose median age was 65 years (22-95). The number of TDDIs detected and maintained during treatment with NMV-r was 164, with the percentage of patients with at least one interaction being 62,33%. The median number of TDDIs per patient was 1 (0-5). At least 1 adverse event (AE) was reported in 18 patients (11,84%). Eleven AEs were potentially related to any TDDI. Seven patients required contact with hospital assistance for AE management. Eight patients had impaired renal function and 2 had impaired liver function at 28 days. The main groups of drugs implicated in the occurrence of an AE were oral anticoagulants and calcium antagonists. Conclusions: Our results show a high number of TDDIs detected were detected between NMV-r and other drugs. This study provides greater knowledge of the drugs involved in such interactions and their potential relationship with the occurrence of adverse events.(AU)

Análisis del grado de implantación de las prácticas de prevención de errores de medicación en los hospitales españoles (2022) / Analysis of the degree of implementation of medication error prevention practices in Spanish hospitals (2022)

Objetivo conocer el grado de implantación de las prácticas de prevención de errores de medicación en los hospitales españoles. Método estudio descriptivo multicéntrico del grado de implantación de las prácticas seguras recogidas en el «Cuestionario de autoevaluación de la seguridad del uso de los medicamentos en los hospitales. Versión II». Participaron aquellos hospitales españoles que cumplimentaron este cuestionario entre octubre de 2021 y septiembre de 2022. El cuestionario contiene 265 ítems de evaluación agrupados en 10 elementos clave. Se calculó la puntuación media y el porcentaje medio sobre el valor máximo posible para el cuestionario completo, los elementos clave y los ítems de evaluación. Los resultados se compararon con los del estudio realizado en 2011. Resultados participaron 131 hospitales de 15 comunidades autónomas. La puntuación media del cuestionario completo en los hospitales fue de 898,2 (57,4% del valor máximo posible). No se encontraron diferencias según la dependencia, el tamaño o la finalidad asistencial, ni en el cuestionario completo ni en los elementos clave. Presentaron los valores más bajos los elementos clave VIII, I y VI, sobre competencia y formación de los profesionales en prácticas seguras (45,1%), disponibilidad y accesibilidad de la información esencial sobre los pacientes (48%) y dispositivos para la administración de medicamentos (52,3%). Con respecto a 2011, se encontraron aumentos significativos tanto en el cuestionario completo como en los elementos clave, excepto en el V y VII, referentes a la estandarización, almacenamiento y distribución de medicamentos, y a los factores del entorno y recursos humanos. ...(AU)

Objective To assess the degree of implementation of medication error prevention practices in Spanish hospitals. Method Descriptive multicenter study of the degree of implementation of the safety practices included in the "Medication use-system safety self-assessment for hospitals. Version. II". Spanish hospitals that completed the questionnaire between October/2021 and September/2022 participated. The survey contains 265 items for evaluation grouped into 10 key elements. Mean score and mean percentages based on the maximum possible values for the overall survey, for the key elements and for each individual item of evaluation were calculated. The results were compared with those of the previous 2011 study. Results A total of 131 hospitals from 15 autonomous regions participated in the study. The mean score of the overall questionnaire in all hospitals was 898.2 (57.4% of the maximum possible score). No differences were found according to dependency, size or type of hospital, either in the overall questionnaire or in the key elements. The lowest values were found for key elements 8, 1 and 6, on competence and training of health professionals in safety practices (45.1%), availability and accessibility of essential information on patients (48%), and devices for administering drugs (52.3%). With respect to 2011, significant increases were found both in the overall questionnaire and in the key elements, except 5 and 7, referring to standardization, storage and distribution of medications, and environmental factors and human resources. Several evaluation items on the safe management of high-risk drugs, medication reconciliation, incorporation of clinical pharmacists into the healthcare teams and implementation of technologies that allow full traceability throughout the medication system, showed low percentages. Conclusions.... (AU)

[Translated article] Safety profile of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: Evidence of adverse events due to DDIs.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety profile of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV-r) in real clinical practice and to analyse the clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions in the development of adverse events. METHODS: Observational, retrospective study in which safety data of patients treated with NMV-r between April and July 2022 in an outpatient setting were evaluated. The duration of follow-up was 28 days and the number of adverse reactions reported, as well as whether they were managed on an outpatient basis or required health care, and the presence of renal and hepatic function impairment were assessed. Concomitant treatment was reviewed, identifying theoretical drug-drug interactions (TDDIs) whose severity was defined using the Lexi-interact classification. RESULTS: The study included 146 patients. 82 (56.16%) were women, whose median age was 65 years (22-95). the number of TDDIs detected and maintained during treatment with NMV-r was 164, with the percentage of patients with at least 1 interaction being 62.33%. The median number of TDDIs per patient was 1 (0-5). At least 1 adverse event (AE) was reported in 18 patients (11.84%). 11 AEs were potentially related to any TDDI. 7 patients required contact with hospital assistance for AE management. 8 patients had impaired renal function and 2 had impaired liver function at 28 days. The main groups of drugs implicated in the occurrence of an AE were oral anticoagulants and calcium antagonists. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a high number of TDDIs detected were detected between NMV-r and other drugs. This study provides greater knowledge of the drugs involved in such interactions and their potential relationship with the occurrence of adverse events.

[Translated article] Analysis of the degree of implementation of medication error prevention practices in Spanish hospitals (2022).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the degree of implementation of medication error prevention practices in Spanish hospitals. METHOD: Descriptive multicenter study of the degree of implementation of the safety practices included in the "Medication use-system safety self-assessment for hospitals. Version. II". Spanish hospitals that completed the questionnaire between October, 2021 and September, 2022 participated. The survey contains 265 items for evaluation grouped into 10 key elements. Mean score and mean percentages based on the maximum possible values for the overall survey, for the key elements, and for each individual item of evaluation were calculated. The results were compared with those of the previous 2011 study. RESULTS: A total of 131 hospitals from 15 autonomous regions participated in the study. The mean score of the overall questionnaire in all hospitals was 898.2 (57.4% of the maximum possible score). No differences were found according to dependency, size, or type of hospital, either in the overall questionnaire or in the key elements. The lowest values were found for key elements VIII, I and VI, on competence and training of health professionals in safety practices (45.1%), availability and accessibility of essential information on patients (48%), and devices for administering drugs (52.3%). With respect to 2011, significant increases were found both in the overall questionnaire and in the key elements, except V and VII, referring to standardization, storage, and distribution of medications, and environmental factors and human resources. Several evaluation items on the safe management of high-risk drugs, medication reconciliation, incorporation of clinical pharmacists into the healthcare teams, and implementation of technologies that allow full traceability throughout the medication system, showed low percentages. CONCLUSIONS: There has been appreciable progress in the degree of implementation of some medication error prevention practices in Spanish hospitals, but many proven efficacy practices recommended by the World Health Organization and safety organizations are still poorly implemented. The information obtained can be useful for prioritizing the practices to be addressed and as a new baseline for monitoring progress.

Analysis of the degree of implementation of medication error prevention practices in Spanish hospitals (2022). / Análisis del grado de implantación de las prácticas de prevención de errores de medicación en los hospitales españoles (2022).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the degree of implementation of medication error prevention practices in Spanish hospitals. METHOD: Descriptive multicenter study of the degree of implementation of the safety practices included in the "Medication use-system safety self-assessment for hospitals. Version. II". Spanish hospitals that completed the questionnaire between October/2021 and September/2022 participated. The survey contains 265 items for evaluation grouped into 10 key elements. Mean score and mean percentages based on the maximum possible values for the overall survey, for the key elements and for each individual item of evaluation were calculated. The results were compared with those of the previous 2011 study. RESULTS: A total of 131 hospitals from 15 autonomous regions participated in the study. The mean score of the overall questionnaire in all hospitals was 898.2 (57.4% of the maximum possible score). No differences were found according to dependency, size or type of hospital, either in the overall questionnaire or in the key elements. The lowest values were found for key elements 8, 1 and 6, on competence and training of health professionals in safety practices (45.1%), availability and accessibility of essential information on patients (48%), and devices for administering drugs (52.3%). With respect to 2011, significant increases were found both in the overall questionnaire and in the key elements, except 5 and 7, referring to standardization, storage and distribution of medications, and environmental factors and human resources. Several evaluation items on the safe management of high-risk drugs, medication reconciliation, incorporation of clinical pharmacists into the healthcare teams and implementation of technologies that allow full traceability throughout the medication system, showed low percentages CONCLUSIONS: There has been appreciable progress in the degree of implementation of some medication error prevention practices in Spanish hospitals, but many proven efficacy practices recommended by the World Health Organization and safety organizations are still poorly implemented. The information obtained can be useful for prioritizing the practices to be addressed and as a new baseline for monitoring progress.

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for the treatment of immunocompromised adult patients with early-stage symptomatic COVID-19: A real-life experience.

Regardless of vaccination status, progression to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still a relevant cause of morbidity among immunocompromised patients. Despite the proven efficacy of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r), concerns remain regarding the potential for drug-to-drug interactions (DDIs) and the safety in this at-risk population. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of immunocompromised patients treated with NMV/r, as well as the occurrence of DDIs and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). This retrospective observational study included all the patients with some form of immunosuppression and laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 that received NMV/r at our center from April to August 2022. The main outcome was worsening of the clinical status (increase of ≥1 point from baseline in a validated clinical progression scale) by Days +7 and +28 after the initiation of therapy. Safety outcomes included the rates of any TEAE and potentially severe DDIs. We included 110 patients. Main causes of immunosuppression were hematological malignancy (58.2%) (mainly multiple myeloma [22.7%] and non-Hodgkin lymphoma [13.6%]), active chemotherapy (30.0%) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (14.5%). Clinical worsening by Days +7 and +28 was observed in four (3.6%) and five patients (4.5%), respectively. Only one patient had a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test at Day +28. At least one potentially severe DDI was observed in 56.4% of the patients. The rate of attributable TEAEs was 10.9%, although only two patients (1.8%) required premature discontinuation of NMV/r. Early initiation of NMV/r therapy should be considered in immunocompromised patients with COVID-19, with particular attention to interacting medications.

[Translated article] Influence of augmented renal clearance in the lower incidence of linezolid-related haematological toxicity.

OBJECTIVES: Linezolid is an oxazolidin commonly related to the development of haematological toxicity, being renal clearance the major factor involved in the drug clearance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of increased filtration rates in the incidence of linezolid-induced haematological toxicity by comparing augmented renal clearance (ARC) patients versus normal renal function patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was conducted on hospitalized patients treated with linezolid for 5 days or more during 2014-2019 period. Patients with a filtration rate of ≥130 mL/min versus reference patients (60-90 mL/min) were compared. Haematological toxicity was defined as a decrease of 25% in platelets, of 25% in haemoglobin, and/or 50% in neutrophils from baseline. Toxicity relevance was classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. Incidence of haematological toxicity between groups was studied by chi-square and Fisher test. Furthermore, percentage diminution of all 3 parameters was calculated and compared by Mann-Whitney test and treatment interruption and transfusion requirements were registered. RESULTS: 30 ARC patients and 38 reference patients were included. Haematological toxicity was observed in 16.66% of ARC patients vs 44.74% of reference patients (P=.014); thrombocytopenia in 13.33% vs 36.84% (P=.051), anaemia in 3.3% vs 10.52% (P=.374) and neutropenia in 10% vs 23.68% (P=.204). Median percentage of platelets decrease in ARC patients was -10.36 (-193.33-62.03) vs 2.68 (-163.16-82.71) in reference patients (P=.333), while haemoglobin decrease was 2.50 (-12.12-25.93) vs 9.09 (-17.72-30.63) (P=.047) and neutrophils decrease was 9.14 (-73.91-76.47) vs 27.33 (-86.66-90.90) (P=.093). 10.5% of normal renal function patients reported at least 1 adverse event grade 3 or superior while 2.6% of them interrupted treatment and 5.2% had transfusion requirements. No major events or interruptions were reported in ARC patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a lower incidence and clinical relevance of haematological toxicity in augmented renal clearance patients. Thrombocytopenia was the major event in both populations. This might be related to a lower exposure to the drug due to the higher clearance and likely lower therapeutic efficiency. These results suggest a potential benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring on high risk patients.

Safety profile of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: Evidence of adverse events due to drug-drug interactions. / Perfil de seguridad de nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: evidencia de eventos adversos por interacciones farmacológicas.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety profile of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV-r) in real clinical practice and to analyze the clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions in the development of adverse events. METHODS: Observational, retrospective study in which safety data of patients treated with NMV-r between April and July 2022 in an outpatient setting were evaluated. The duration of follow-up was 28 days and the number of adverse reactions reported, as well as whether they were managed on an outpatient basis or required health care, and the presence of renal and hepatic function impairment were assessed. Concomitant treatment was reviewed, identifying theoretical drug-drug interactions (TDDIs) whose severity was defined using the Lexi-interact classification. RESULTS: The study included 146 patients, 82 (56,16%) were women, whose median age was 65 years (22-95). The number of TDDIs detected and maintained during treatment with NMV-r was 164, with the percentage of patients with at least one interaction being 62,33%. The median number of TDDIs per patient was 1 (0-5). At least 1 adverse event (AE) was reported in 18 patients (11,84%). Eleven AEs were potentially related to any TDDI. Seven patients required contact with hospital assistance for AE management. Eight patients had impaired renal function and 2 had impaired liver function at 28 days. The main groups of drugs implicated in the occurrence of an AE were oral anticoagulants and calcium antagonists. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a high number of TDDIs detected were detected between NMV-r and other drugs. This study provides greater knowledge of the drugs involved in such interactions and their potential relationship with the occurrence of adverse events.

Influencia de la hiperfiltración glomerular en la menor toxicidad hematológica inducida por linezolid / Influence of augmented renal clearance on the lower incidence of linezolid-related hematological toxicity

Objetivos linezolid es una oxazolidina frecuentemente implicada en el desarrollo de toxicidad hematológica, siendo el aclaramiento renal el mecanismo mayoritario en su eliminación. Se evaluó la influencia de la hiperfiltración glomerular en la toxicidad hematológica inducida por linezolid en pacientes con aclaramiento incrementado frente a pacientes con función renal normal. Material y métodos se diseñó un estudio observacional y retrospectivo en pacientes hospitalizados, tratados al menos 5 días con linezolid entre 2014 y 2019. Se compararon pacientes con aclaramiento de creatinina incrementado (≥130 mL/min) y normal (60–90 mL/min). Se definió la toxicidad hematológica como el descenso en plaquetas y hemoglobina del 25% y en neutrófilos del 50% frente a los valores basales. Se clasificó el grado de toxicidad según Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5 y se comparó la incidencia entre ambos grupos mediante Chi-cuadrado y Fisher. Así mismo, se calculó el porcentaje de disminución de los 3 parámetros y su asociación mediante el test de Mann–Whitney y se registraron las interrupciones y transfusiones asociadas.Resultados se evaluaron 30 pacientes hiperfiltradores y 38 normofiltradores. El 16,66% de hiperfiltradores presentó toxicidad hematológica frente al 44,74% (p = 0,014). La trombocitopenia fue del 13,33 vs. 36,84% (p = 0,051), la anemia del 3,3 vs. 10,52% (p = 0,374) y la neutropenia del 10 vs. 23,68% (p = 0,204). La mediana del porcentaje de descenso plaquetario en hiperfiltradores frente a normofiltradores fue del −10,36 (−193,33–62,03) vs. 2,68 (−163,16–82,71) (p = 0,333), de hemoglobina 2,50 (−12,12–25,93) vs. 9,09 (−17,72–30,63) (p = 0,047) y de neutrófilos 9,14 (−73,91–76,47) vs. 27,33 (−86,66–90,90) (p = 0,093). El 10,5% con filtrado normal presentó toxicidad grado 3 o superior, el 2,6% interrumpió el tratamiento y el 5,2% requirieron transfusiones... (AU)

Objectives Linezolid is an oxazolidin commonly related to the development of hematological toxicity, being renal clearance the major factor involved in the drug clearance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of increased filtration rates in the incidence of linezolid-induced hematological toxicity by comparing augmented renal clearance (ARC) patients versus normal renal function patients. Material and methods A retrospective, observational study was conducted on hospitalized patients treated with linezolid for 5 days or more during 2014–2019 period. Patients with a filtration rate of ≥130 mL/min versus reference patients (60–90 mL/min) were compared. Hematological toxicity was defined as a decrease of 25% in platelets, of 25% in hemoglobin and/or 50% in neutrophils from baseline. Toxicity relevance was classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. Incidence of hematological toxicity between groups was studied by chi-square and Fisher test. Furthermore, percentaje disminution of all three parameters was calculated and compared by Mann–Whitney test and treatment interruption and tranfusion requirements were registered. Results 30 ARC patients and 38 reference patients were included. Hematological toxicity was observed in 16.66% of ARC patients vs 44.74% of reference patients (p = 0.014); thrombocytopenia in 13.33% vs 36.84% (p = 0.051), anemia in 3.3% vs 10.52% (p = 0.374) and neutropenia in 10% vs 23.68% (p = 0.204). Median percentaje of platelets decrease in ARC patients was −10.36 (−193.33–62.03) vs 2.68 (−163.16–82.71) in reference patients (p = 0.333), while hemoglobin decrease was 2.50 (−12.12–25.93) vs 9.09 (−17.72–30.63) (p = 0.047) and neutrophils decrease was 9.14 (−73.91–76.47) vs 27.33 (−86.66–90.90) (p = 0.093). 10.5% of normal renal function patients reported at least one adverse event grade 3 or superior while 2.6% of them interrupted treatment and 5.2% had tranfusion requirements... (AU)

Influence of augmented renal clearance on the lower incidence of linezolid-related hematological toxicity. / Influencia de la hiperfiltración glomerular en la menor toxicidad hematológica inducida por linezolid.

OBJECTIVES: Linezolid is an oxazolidin commonly related to the development of hematological toxicity, being renal clearance the major factor involved in the drug clearance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of increased filtration rates in the incidence of linezolid-induced hematological toxicity by comparing augmented renal clearance (ARC) patients versus normal renal function patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was conducted on hospitalized patients treated with linezolid for 5 days or more during 2014-2019 period. Patients with a filtration rate of ≥130 mL/min versus reference patients (60-90 mL/min) were compared. Hematological toxicity was defined as a decrease of 25% in platelets, of 25% in hemoglobin and/or 50% in neutrophils from baseline. Toxicity relevance was classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. Incidence of hematological toxicity between groups was studied by chi-square and Fisher test. Furthermore, percentaje disminution of all three parameters was calculated and compared by Mann-Whitney test and treatment interruption and tranfusion requirements were registered. RESULTS: 30 ARC patients and 38 reference patients were included. Hematological toxicity was observed in 16.66% of ARC patients vs 44.74% of reference patients (p = 0.014); thrombocytopenia in 13.33% vs 36.84% (p = 0.051), anemia in 3.3% vs 10.52% (p = 0.374) and neutropenia in 10% vs 23.68% (p = 0.204). Median percentaje of platelets decrease in ARC patients was -10.36 (-193.33-62.03) vs 2.68 (-163.16-82.71) in reference patients (p = 0.333), while hemoglobin decrease was 2.50 (-12.12-25.93) vs 9.09 (-17.72-30.63) (p = 0.047) and neutrophils decrease was 9.14 (-73.91-76.47) vs 27.33 (-86.66-90.90) (p = 0.093). 10.5% of normal renal function patients reported at least one adverse event grade 3 or superior while 2.6% of them interrupted treatment and 5.2% had tranfusion requirements. No major events or interruptions were reported in ARC patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a lower incidence and clinical relevance of hematological toxicity in augmented renal clearance patients. Thrombocytopenia was the major event in both populations. This might be related to a lower exposure to the drug due to the higher clearance and likely lower therapeutic efficiency. These results suggest a potential benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring on high risk patients.

A joint program of antimicrobial stewardship and hospital-acquired infection control to reduce healthcare-associated infections after kidney transplantation: The Hipomenes study.

Infection is a common complication in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The usefulness of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) and hospital-acquired infection control (HAIC) initiatives in the general inpatient population is well established. We performed a quasi-experimental study to evaluate a joint ASP/HAIC initiative focused on KTRs. A dedicated ASP team optimized antimicrobial prescriptions in consecutive KTRs during the intervention period (June 2015-March 2016). A multifaceted, evidence-based HAIC program was concurrently implemented. Results were compared with the preceding period (June 2014-March 2015). We included 96 and 100 KTRs in the intervention and preintervention periods, respectively. There was a reduction in the consumption of meropenem (rate ratio [RR]: 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.75; P <.0001), ceftazidime (RR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.21-0.45; P <.0001), vancomycin (RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.53-0.8; P <.0001), and ciprofloxacin (RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.55-0.81; P <.0001) and an increase of fosfomycin (RR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.17-2.76; P =.008) during the intervention period. The incidence of cystitis (RR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.28-0.33; P <.001) and upper urinary tract infection (RR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.33-0.95; P =.04) decreased. A specific ASP/HAIC initiative was effective in optimizing antimicrobial use and reducing the incidence of common bacterial infections among KTRs.

Antimicrobial Defined Daily Dose in Neonatal Population: Validation in the Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no validated method for estimating antimicrobial consumption in the neonatal population, as it exists for adults using Defined Daily Doses (DDD). In neonatology, although there are different methods, each one with advantages and disadvantages, there is no unified criterion for use. The aim of this study is to validate the neonatal DDD designed as a new standardised form of antimicrobial consumption over this population. METHODS: The validation of the neonatal DDD, Phase II of the research project, was carried out through a descriptive observational study. Periodic cut-offs were performed to collect antimicrobial prescriptions of neonates admitted to the neonatology and intensive care units of nine Spanish hospitals. The data collected included demographic variables (gestational age, postnatal age, weight and sex), antimicrobial dose, frequency and route of administration. The selection of the optimal DDD value takes into account power value, magnitude obtained from the differences in the DDD, statistical significance obtained by the Wilcoxon test and degree of agreement in the stipulated doses. RESULTS: Set of 904 prescriptions were collected and finally 860 were analysed based on the established criteria. The antimicrobials were mostly prescribed in the intensive care unit (63.1%). 32 different antimicrobials were collected, and intravenous administration was the most commonly used route. Neonatal DDD were defined for 11 different antimicrobials. A potency > 80% was obtained in 7 antibiotics. The 57.1% of the selected DDD correspond to phase I and 21.4% from phase II. CONCLUSION: DDD validation has been achieved for the majority of intravenously administered antimicrobials used in clinical practice in the neonatal population. This will make it possible to have an indicator that will be used globally to estimate the consumption of antimicrobials in this population, thus confirming its usefulness and applicability.

Healthcare outcomes in patients with HIV infection at a tertiary hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the care of patients with other diseases. Difficulty in access to healthcare during these months has been especially relevant for persons with HIV infection (PWH). This study therefore sought to ascertain the clinical outcomes and effectiveness of the measures implemented among PWH in a region with one of the highest incidence rates in Europe. METHODS: Retrospective, observational, pre-post intervention study to compare the outcomes of PWH attended at a high-complexity healthcare hospital from March to October 2020 and during the same months across the period 2016-2019. The intervention consisted of home drug deliveries and preferential use of non face-to-face consultations. The effectiveness of the measures implemented was determined by reference to the number of emergency visits, hospitalisations, mortality rate, and percentage of PWH with viral load >50copies, before and after the two pandemic waves. RESULTS: A total of 2760 PWH were attended from January 2016 to October 2020. During the pandemic, there was a monthly mean of 106.87 telephone consultations and 2075 home deliveries of medical drugs dispensed to ambulatory patients. No statistically significant differences were found between the rate of admission of patients with COVID-HIV co-infection and that of the remaining patients (1172.76 admissions/100,000 population vs. 1424.29, p=0.401) or in mortality (11.54% vs. 12.96%, p=0.939). The percentage of PWH with viral load >50copies was similar before and after the pandemic (1.20% pre-pandemic vs. 0.51% in 2020, p=0.078). CONCLUSION: Our results show that the strategies implemented during the first 8 months of the pandemic prevented any deterioration in the control and follow-up parameters routinely used on PWH. Furthermore, they contribute to the debate about how telemedicine and telepharmacy can fit into future healthcare models.

Healthcare outcomes in patients with HIV infection at a tertiary hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic / Resultados en la atención a pacientes con infección por VIH en un hospital terciario durante la pandemia COVID-19

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the care of patients with other diseases. Difficulty in access to healthcare during these months has been especially relevant for persons with HIV infection (PWH). This study therefore sought to ascertain the clinical outcomes and effectiveness of the measures implemented among PWH in a region with one of the highest incidence rates in Europe. Methods: Retrospective, observational, pre-post intervention study to compare the outcomes of PWH attended at a high-complexity healthcare hospital from March to October 2020 and during the same months across the period 2016–2019. The intervention consisted of home drug deliveries and preferential use of non face-to-face consultations. The effectiveness of the measures implemented was determined by reference to the number of emergency visits, hospitalisations, mortality rate, and percentage of PWH with viral load >50copies, before and after the two pandemic waves. Results: A total of 2760 PWH were attended from January 2016 to October 2020. During the pandemic, there was a monthly mean of 106.87 telephone consultations and 2075 home deliveries of medical drugs dispensed to ambulatory patients. No statistically significant differences were found between the rate of admission of patients with COVID-HIV co-infection and that of the remaining patients (1172.76 admissions/100,000 population vs. 1424.29, p=0.401) or in mortality (11.54% vs. 12.96%, p=0.939). The percentage of PWH with viral load >50copies was similar before and after the pandemic (1.20% pre-pandemic vs. 0.51% in 2020, p=0.078). Conclusion: Our results show that the strategies implemented during the first 8 months of the pandemic prevented any deterioration in the control and follow-up parameters routinely used on PWH. Furthermore, they contribute to the debate about how telemedicine and telepharmacy can fit into future healthcare models.(AU)

Introducción: La pandemia causada por el SARS-CoV-2 ha afectado a la atención de pacientes con otras enfermedades. La dificultad en el acceso a la asistencia sanitaria durante estos meses es especialmente relevante en las personas con infección por VIH (PCV). El objetivo del estudio fue conocer los resultados clínicos y la efectividad de las medidas implementadas en PCV en una de las regiones con mayor incidencia de Europa. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo, pre-postintervención, comparando los resultados de PCV atendidos en un hospital de alta complejidad entre marzo-octubre de 2020 y el mismo periodo de 2016 a 2019. La intervención consistió en el envío a domicilio de medicamentos y la realización preferente de consultas no presenciales. La efectividad de las medidas implementadas se determinó por el número de visitas a urgencias, hospitalizaciones, mortalidad y porcentaje de PCV con carga viral>50 copias antes y después de 2 olas pandémicas. Resultados: Se atendieron 2.760 PCV entre enero de 2016 y octubre de 2020. Durante la pandemia se realizaron una media mensual de 106,87 consultas telefónicas y 2.075 envíos a domicilio de medicamentos de dispensación ambulatoria. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la frecuentación de pacientes con coinfección COVID-VIH respecto al resto (1.172,76 ingresos/100.000 habitantes vs. 1.424,29, p=0,401), ni en su mortalidad (11,54 vs. 12,96%, p=0,939). El porcentaje de PCV con carga viral>50 copias fue similar antes y después de la pandemia (1,20% prepandemia vs. 0,51% en 2020, p=0,078). Conclusión: Nuestros resultados revelan que las estrategias implementadas durante los 8 primeros meses de pandemia han evitado el deterioro en parámetros de control y seguimiento empleados habitualmente en PCV. Además, contribuyen a la reflexión sobre el encaje de la telemedicina y telefarmacia en modelos asistenciales futuros.(AU)

Healthcare outcomes in patients with HIV infection at a tertiary hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the care of patients with other diseases. Difficulty in access to healthcare during these months has been especially relevant for persons with HIV infection (PWH). This study therefore sought to ascertain the clinical outcomes and effectiveness of the measures implemented among PWH in a region with one of the highest incidence rates in Europe. Methods: Retrospective, observational, pre-post intervention study to compare the outcomes of PWH attended at a high-complexity healthcare hospital from March to October 2020 and during the same months across the period 2016-2019. The intervention consisted of home drug deliveries and preferential use of non face-to-face consultations. The effectiveness of the measures implemented was determined by reference to the number of emergency visits, hospitalisations, mortality rate, and percentage of PWH with viral load >50 copies, before and after the two pandemic waves. Results: A total of 2760 PWH were attended from January 2016 to October 2020. During the pandemic, there was a monthly mean of 106.87 telephone consultations and 2075 home deliveries of medical drugs dispensed to ambulatory patients. No statistically significant differences were found between the rate of admission of patients with COVID-HIV co-infection and that of the remaining patients (1172.76 admissions/100,000 population vs. 1424.29, p = 0.401) or in mortality (11.54% vs. 12.96%, p = 0.939). The percentage of PWH with viral load >50 copies was similar before and after the pandemic (1.20% pre-pandemic vs. 0.51% in 2020, p = 0.078). Conclusion: Our results show that the strategies implemented during the first 8 months of the pandemic prevented any deterioration in the control and follow-up parameters routinely used on PWH. Furthermore, they contribute to the debate about how telemedicine and telepharmacy can fit into future healthcare models.

Introducción: La pandemia causada por el SARS-CoV-2 ha afectado a la atención de pacientes con otras enfermedades. La dificultad en el acceso a la asistencia sanitaria durante estos meses es especialmente relevante en las personas con infección por VIH (PCV). El objetivo del estudio fue conocer los resultados clínicos y la efectividad de las medidas implementadas en PCV en una de las regiones con mayor incidencia de Europa. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo, pre-postintervención, comparando los resultados de PCV atendidos en un hospital de alta complejidad entre marzo-octubre de 2020 y el mismo periodo de 2016 a 2019. La intervención consistió en el envío a domicilio de medicamentos y la realización preferente de consultas no presenciales. La efectividad de las medidas implementadas se determinó por el número de visitas a urgencias, hospitalizaciones, mortalidad y porcentaje de PCV con carga viral > 50 copias antes y después de 2 olas pandémicas. Resultados: Se atendieron 2.760 PCV entre enero de 2016 y octubre de 2020. Durante la pandemia se realizaron una media mensual de 106,87 consultas telefónicas y 2.075 envíos a domicilio de medicamentos de dispensación ambulatoria. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la frecuentación de pacientes con coinfección COVID-VIH respecto al resto (1.172,76 ingresos/100.000 habitantes vs. 1.424,29, p = 0,401), ni en su mortalidad (11,54 vs. 12,96%, p = 0,939). El porcentaje de PCV con carga viral > 50 copias fue similar antes y después de la pandemia (1,20% prepandemia vs. 0,51% en 2020, p = 0,078). Conclusión: Nuestros resultados revelan que las estrategias implementadas durante los 8 primeros meses de pandemia han evitado el deterioro en parámetros de control y seguimiento empleados habitualmente en PCV. Además, contribuyen a la reflexión sobre el encaje de la telemedicina y telefarmacia en modelos asistenciales futuros.

Analysis of immune-mediated reactions in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab and its association with effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE: To study immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with nivolumab, as well as to assess whether these reactions could be predictors of further effectiveness of therapy. METHODS: Retrospective, observational and longitudinal study. All NSCLC patients who received nivolumab between February 2015-May 2020 were included. In terms of safety, irAEs and their severity were registered and to evaluate the effectiveness, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated. RESULTS: 75 patients were included. 32 patients (43%) were reported irAES. Mainly the irAEs affected the skin (36%). Followed by pneumonitis (20%), gastrointestinal reactions (12%), endocrine (12%) and hepatitis (12%). Regarding severity, 92% were moderate. The median PFS was 9.49 months on the group with irAEs versus 1.99 months on the group without irAEs group (p < 0.0001). The median OS was 17.44 months versus 7.67 months respectively (p = 0.0001). According to the incidence of irAEs developed ( = > 2 vs. 1 vs. 0), the median PFS was 20.53 versus 5.35 versus 1.99 months respectively (p < 0.0001). The median OS was 23.41 versus 15.80 versus 7.67 months, respectively (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: In a significant number of patients irAEs occur, generally of grade 1-2 severity, affecting mainly the skin, lungs and gastrointestinal system. We confirm that the development of irAEs in patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab is a strong predictor of treatment effectiveness in both PFS and OS, with statistically significant results. On those patients who experience two or more immunorelated adverse events the greatest benefit has been observed.

[Lean Six Sigma in the implementation of automated dispensing systems: improving the safe use of medications in thoracic surgery.] / Lean Seis Sigma en la implantación de sistemas automatizados de dispensación: mejora del uso seguro del medicamento en cirugía torácica.

OBJECTIVE: Medications errors are a major problem that can cause a harm to inpatients. The main objective of the study was to compared medication errors in pharmacotherapeutic process before and after to carried out an intervention: to implant an automated dispensing cabine with to use Lean Six Sigma methodology. The secondary objective was to assess process performance, sigma level and defects per one million opportunities for medication error. METHODS: Quasi-experimental and randomized study carried out in a Thoracic Surgery Unit of a Spanish Hospital. A pharmaceutic recorded and assesed the medication errors detected during pre-intervention period (july-august 2017) and post-intervention period (march-april 2018). The steps analyzed were dispensing, storage and compounding/administration. The pharmacist observed a third of the medication dispensed, stored and compounded/administered during the study period. The observed medication was randomly selected using AleatorMetod.xls software. To perform the statistical analysis, Student's t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare quantitative variables, and Chi-square test for qualitative variables. A significance level of p<0.05 was considered. RESULTS: The pharmaceutic recorded 4,538 drugs. After intervention, medication errors were decreased a 49% in total pharmacotherapeutic process (12.06% vs 6.15%; p<0.001). In addition, errors were decreased a 91.6% (4.27% vs 0.36%; p=0.004) in the step of medication storage; and a 75.8% (22.52% vs 5.46%; p<0.001) in the step of drugs compounding/administration. However, medication errors were increased in the step of medication dispensing (4.51% vs 15.29%; p<0.001). The process performance increased a 6% (87.9% vs 93.9%), sigma level increased from 2.67 to 3.04 and defects per one million opportunities for medication error decreased a 49%. CONCLUSIONS: To implant an automated dispensing cabinet with Lean Six Sigma methodology helps create a safer environment for the inpatient, reducing medication errors in the steps of storage and preparation/administration, as well as improving the total process performance and sigma level.

OBJETIVO: Los errores de medicación son un problema importante que pueden provocar un daño en los pacientes hospitalizados. El objetivo principal del estudio fue evaluar los errores de medicación en el circuito farmacoterapéutico antes y después de realizar una intervención: implantación de un Sistema Automatizado de Dispensación con la utilización de metodología Lean Seis Sigma. El objetivo secundario fue evaluar el rendimiento del proceso, el nivel sigma y los defectos por millón de oportunidades de error en la medicación. METODOS: Estudio cuasi-experimental y aleatorizado realizado en la Unidad de Cirugía Torácica de un Hospital Español. Un farmacéutico registró y evaluó los errores detectados durante las fases pre-intervención (julio-agosto 2017) y post-intervención (marzo-abril 2018). Las etapas analizadas fueron dispensación, almacenaje y preparación/administración. El farmacéutico observó un tercio de la medicación dispensada, almacenada y preparada/administrada durante el periodo de estudio. La medicación observada fue seleccionada de forma aleatoria utilizando el software AleatorMetod.xls. Para realizar el análisis estadístico se utilizó la prueba t de Student y el test U de Mann-Whitney para comparar variables cuantitativas y la prueba Chi-cuadrado para variables categóricas. Se consideró un nivel de significación de p<0,05. RESULTADOS: Se observaron 4.538 fármacos. Tras realizar la intervención, se redujeron un 49% los errores detectados durante el circuito farmacoterapéutico global (12,06% vs 6,15%; p<0,001). Además, se redujo un 91,6% (4,27% vs 0,36%; p=0,004) los errores en la etapa de almacenaje y un 75,8% (22,52% vs 5,46%; p<0,001) en la etapa de preparación/administración. Sin embargo, hubo un aumento en la etapa de dispensación (4,51% vs 15,29%; p<0,001). El rendimiento global se incrementó un 6% (87,9% vs 93,9%), el nivel de sigma aumentó de 2,67 a 3,04 y se redujeron un 49% de defectos por millón de oportunidades de error en la medicación. CONCLUSIONES: La implantación de Sistemas Automatizados de Dispensación con metodología Lean Seis Sigma ayuda a la creación de un entorno más seguro para el paciente, disminuyendo los errores de medicación en las etapas de almacenaje y preparación/administración, además de mejorar el rendimiento global del circuito.

Lean Seis Sigma en la implantación de sistemas automatizados de dispensación: mejora del uso seguro del medicamento en cirugía torácica / Lean Six Sigma in the implementation of automated dispensing systems: improving the safe use of medications in thoracic surgery

Fundamentos: Los errores de medicación son un problema importante que pueden provocar un daño en los pacientes hospitalizados. El objetivo principal del estudio fueevaluar los errores de medicación en el circuito farmacote rapéutico antes y después de realizar una intervención: implantación de un Sistema Automatizado de Dispensación conla utilización de metodología Lean Seis Sigma. El objetivosecundario fue evaluar el rendimiento del proceso, el nivelsigma y los defectos por millón de oportunidades de error enla medicación.Métodos: Estudio cuasi-experimental y aleatorizadorealizado en la Unidad de Cirugía Torácica de un HospitalEspañol. Un farmacéutico registró y evaluó los errores detectados durante las fases prentervención (julio-agosto 2017)y post-intervención (marzo-abril 2018). Las etapas analizadas fueron dispensación, almacenaje y preparación/administración. El farmacéutico observó un tercio de la medicacióndispensada, almacenada y preparada/administrada durante elperiodo de estudio. La medicación observada fue seleccionada de forma aleatoria utilizando el software AleatorMetod.xls.Para realizar el análisis estadístico se utilizó la prueba t deStudent y el test U de Mann-Whitney para comparar variablescuantitativas y la prueba Chi-cuadrado para variables categóricas. Se consideró un nivel de significación de p<0,05.Resultados: Se observaron 4.538 fármacos. Tras realizar la intervención, se redujeron un 49% los errores detectados durante el circuito farmacoterapéutico global (12,06%vs 6,15%; p<0,001). Además, se redujo un 91,6% (4,27% vs0,36%; p=0,004) los errores en la etapa de almacenaje y un75,8% (22,52% vs 5,46%; p<0,001) en la etapa de preparación/administración. Sin embargo, hubo un aumento en la etapa dedispensación (4,51% vs 15,29%; p<0,001).(AU)

Background: Medications errors are a major problemthat can cause a harm to inpatients. The main objective of thestudy was to compared medication errors in pharmacotherapeutic process before and after to carried out an intervention:to implant an automated dispensing cabine with to use LeanSix Sigma methodology. The secondary objective was to assess process performance, sigma level and defects per one million opportunities for medication error.Methods: Quasi-experimental and randomized studycarried out in a Thoracic Surgery Unit of a Spanish Hospital.A pharmaceutic recorded and assesed the medication errorsdetected during pre-intervention period (july-august 2017)and post-intervention period (march-april 2018). The stepsanalyzed were dispensing, storage and compounding/administration. The pharmacist observed a third of the medicationdispensed, stored and compounded/administered during thestudy period. The observed medication was randomly selected using AleatorMetod.xls software. To perform the statistical analysis, Student’s t test and Mann-Whitney U test wereused to compare quantitative variables, and Chi-square testfor qualitative variables. A significance level of p<0.05 wasconsidered.Results: The pharmaceutic recorded 4,538 drugs. Afterintervention, medication errors were decreased a 49% in totalpharmacotherapeutic process (12.06% vs 6.15%; p<0.001). Inaddition, errors were decreased a 91.6% (4.27% vs 0.36%;p=0.004) in the step of medication storage; and a 75.8%(22.52% vs 5.46%; p<0.001) in the step of drugs compounding/administration. However, medication errors were increased in the step of medication dispensing (4.51% vs 15.29%;p<0.001). The process performance increased a 6% (87.9%vs 93.9%), sigma level increased from 2.67 to 3.04 and defects per one million opportunities for medication error decreased a 49%.(AU)

Intervention by a clinical pharmacist carried out at discharge of elderly patients admitted to the internal medicine department: influence on readmissions and costs.

BACKGROUND: Patient education on pharmacological treatment could reduce readmissions. Our objective was to carry out a pharmacist intervention focused on providing information about high-risk medications to chronic patients and to analyse its influence on readmissions and costs. METHODS: A single-centre study with an intervention group and a retrospective control group was conducted. The intervention was carried out in all polymedicated patients ≥ 65 years who were admitted to internal medicine and signed the informed consent between June 2017 and February 2018. Patients discharged to nursing homes or long-term hospitals were excluded. The control group were all the patients who were admitted during the same months of 2014 who met the same inclusion criteria. The patients were classified according to the HOSPITAL score as having a low, intermediate, or high risk of potentially avoidable readmission. Outcome measures were 30-day readmission and cost data. To analyse the effect of the intervention on readmission, a logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: The study included 589 patients (286 intervention group; 303 control group). The readmission rate decreased from 20.13% to 16.43% in the intervention group [OR = 0.760 95% CI (0.495-1.166); p = 0.209)]. The incremental cost for the intervention to prevent one readmission was €3,091.19, and the net cost saving was €1,301.26. In the intermediate- and high-risk groups, readmissions were reduced 10.91% and 10.00%, and the net cost savings were €3,3143.15 and €3,248.71, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacist intervention achieved savings in the number of readmissions, and the net cost savings were greater in patients with intermediate and high risks of potentially avoidable readmission according to the HOSPITAL score.